Digital Verses Traditional Illustration

By heather at 6:19 pm on Wednesday, May 23, 2007

My colleague, a web designer and digital illustrator, has taken up a life drawing class to improve his illustration skills. He’s a natural, and his digital illustrating skills transferred well to the life drawing environment as his eye was well trained to create some lovely pieces. His instructor centred him out and asked him if he’s done any lessons before because he’s talented. He modestly told her ‘No, but I’m a web designer, I do some digital illustration.’ And her response? “Oh, so nothing real then?”

That simple comment pinpoints the new attitude steadily developing in the illustration field… a snobbery of sorts, an underlying rivalry, a subtle attitude… a rift between digital and traditional illustrators. On one side of the line there are the “old school” illustrators, clinging to their pencils and brushes, their tacky palettes of colour unachievable in RGB, their stained clothes and chemical tarnished lungs, and the ability to put a tangible product in their client’s hot little hands. And on the other side of the line are the “newbies,” the growing mass of digital illustrators who prefer the smooth contours of the mouse beneath their fingers, the visually controlled crisp lines of vectorized graphics, the pixel perfect renderings and gradients achievable by their beloved macs and pc’s, the warm glow of their monitors, FTP transfers and digital proofs… and the security of Apple-Z.

With such different preferences for medium, is it a wonder that there is a growing anxiousness between illustrators on both sides of the line about where one’s place is? Which will dominate the illustration industry in the future? Which will be taken more seriously?

The fear that traditional illustrators have is that they will be phased out–that the timeless tradition of painting and drawing will become obsolete in the wave of kids who learn how to colour on the computer with their cute little mouse by the time they are three-years-old! Behind that is the real fear though… that traditional illustrators will be out of work, that no one wants traditional illustration anymore.

As an “old school” illustrator, I had those fears myself, and wondered if I should jump ship and ride the of digital illustration wave… but after evaluating what I do and where I want to go in my career, I realized that jumping ship at this point would be acting out of the fear. Then taking another step back, I realized that I don’t need to compete with digital illustrators for work… just as I don’t compete with comic book artists, or animators, or graphic designers, or any other type of artist who does something different to the style of artwork I do. I’ve come to really appreciate digital artwork, as it has made me focus on what makes my traditional artwork unique, and pushes me to keep learning and developing new styles in traditional mediums.

Disposable and Easy
There are some assumption about digital illustration that are a bit sad : that it is quicker and easier to create a digital illustration than a traditional illustration. Digital illustrators, though they may create amazing illustrations, aren’t taken as seriously as traditional painters because their work is digital, and it isn’t recognized as a ’serious’ medium.

I had an instructor once say to me that the tools don’t really matter as long as the final product is amazing… what does it matter if he decides to use his little finger to smudge some paint so it’s just right, just because it’s not a paintbrush doesn’t mean it isn’t art! The same is with digital illustration… the end product can be amazing depending on the artist, not the medium. Digital is just another ‘medium’ of illustration, just another tool with its own benefits and drawbacks, another style, another movement… it is many things, but it is not the demise of traditional illustration!

The attitude that digital illustration isn’t “real” is fast changing… just as the photography industry has finally embraced digital photography, it won’t be long before fine-digital-art is being honored in museums and art galleries.

Supply and Demand
On the flip side of the coin, the attitude that digital art isn’t taken seriously because it isn’t a rare commodity is much more true. Unfortunately, when something can be created in mass quantities at a low cost (and there isn’t any lower cost than hitting Apple-C!) it is no longer seen as a rare-commodity.

Because ‘digital’ is the original form of the artwork (light pixels generated from binary 0’s and 1’s in your computer) it means that ANYONE can have the original work of art if they can get their hands on the digital file. The Mona Lisa is a priceless work of art because it is the only one… nothing can replicate it, it’s one-of-a-kind.

Whereas a work of digital art can be recreated an unlimited number of times and still be identical to the original down to the last pixel. So digital illustrators may have a supply & demand issue on their hands as far as fine-digital-art goes, making it difficult to attach a pricey tag to digital art reproductions sold in a gallery setting. It will be interesting to see how digital illustrators overcome this hurdle in years to come!

Industry niches
There are plenty of avenues for both traditional & digital illustrators to follow without even competing with each other for work :

Children’s book publishers seek out traditional illustrators for children’s books, as there is a warmth and tactile quality that is difficult (but not impossible) to achieve with digital illustration. They tend to prefer traditional illustrators as it visually stimulates the children with something different than what they see when playing video games, playing on the computer and watch on Saturday morning cartoons.

Greeting card companies rely heavily on traditional illustrators as the majority of the market who buy greeting cards are women who are drawn to sentimental imagery… but that being said, vectorized illustrations are fast replacing the ‘cartoon’ humour style cards and there is always a need for bright and graphic cartoon humour cards.

The video game industry relies heavily on digital illustrators, as images created digitally have a much smaller file size than a scanned piece of art would be… and because the end result needs to be married with the code to run the game, a small file size is essential. So illustrators who specialize in rendering and textures are in high demand in the gaming industry. But, traditional illustrators are still able to delve into this industry, as their skills are sought after for concept, character, and background art.

Website development relies heavily on digital illustration for graphics, icons, illustrations, logos, etc. Similar to the video game industry, small file size is essential…and digital illustrations can be reduced to only a few kilobytes in size without compromising the quality, or looking ‘pixely.’ Traditional illustrations, when properly scanned and saved for web use, are frequently used… but it is more common for traditional illustrations to be purchased as stock images rather than commissioned directly for a website.

Graphic design firms rely on both digital and traditional illustrators for printed packaging, books, brochures, business cards, signage, etc…

Advertising firms use storyboard artists to illustrate their concepts, which they in turn pitch to clients. Traditional illustrators using pen & marker, or digital illustrators using wacom tablet and Photoshop, can easily work side-by-side in this industry.

Architectural firms also marry digital & traditional illustration when creating a ‘rendered’ illustration of a building… illustrators on staff render an illustration of what the final building will look like with landscaping and people walking about… and this can be done either on the computer or with paintbrush on paper.

A Happy Medium
Traditional & Digital illustrators can benefit by taking a feather from each other’s caps.

Traditional illustrators can embrace the digital side of illustration and marry it with their illustration style. They can add to their repertoire of skills the ability to scan and colour correct high-resolution files to provide to their clients, rather than packaging up the final artwork and posting it off. They can learn to touch up their artwork in Photoshop, or add a little extra bleed around the edges for their client. They can experiment with different techniques of digital illustration.

Digital illustrators can learn to get a little dirty ;) Drawing from life is an excellent way of developing illustration skills. Learning how to see light as it is in real life, rather than relying on what the Photoshop filters can do for you. Starting sketches on paper first, and then rendering the final artwork on the computer screen will result in more dynamic and fluid digital illustrations. Learning how to use one traditional art medium (pencil, paint, sculpture) will broaden their appreciation for texture and colour application beyond what Pantone’s latest digital swatch library offers.

Staying in touch
I spend most of my time at work staring at a computer screen with my fingers typing away on a keyboard and mouse. So I find it a real release, and feel ‘alive’ drawing and painting, creating something visual and tactile from graphite, water, clay, or plant matter. I reckon while embracing the digital age, illustrators should keep in touch with that human side of being an artist, and keep that relationship between pencil and paper alive.

Filed under: inspiration, business of illustration

5 Comments »

1
Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

Comment by digital portrait artists

May 24, 2007 @ 2:06 am

This is the same dilemma that exists between traditional photography and digital photography, too. The digital side is already making a grand entrance in just about anything in the world. From photography to painting, the digital age continues to revolutionize everything.

But if you were to be asked, which is more advantageous to go digital or to stick with the traditional?

2
Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

Pingback by blog.illustrationcastle.com » Digital Verses Traditional Illustration : Part 2

May 24, 2007 @ 4:40 pm

Heather here : Thanks for your comment! I posted a reply here.

3
Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

Comment by Bjorn

May 27, 2007 @ 12:53 am

Ah, so nice to see that there is discussion about this topic!
I’m an illustrator who works in traditional media. I do use my Mac, a lot actually. But not in the creative process, only some colour correction and rethouching.
The reason I’m not working digitally has everything to do with the fact that the appearance of the analoge manufactured piece is very important in the way I want my images to look. The painted image has a certain ‘warmth’ to it, and this atmosphere is a part of my work. Sure, there is a software app called Painter that mimicks the paint. It works quite well. I know illustrators who master this tool like no other. But Painter wil not make mistakes. Like you mentioned, there is alway the famous Apple-Z option. Every piece looks perfect in Painter.
My images don’t. There are bristles showing if you examine a piece closely and sometimes I repainted a piece but you still see a little bit of the mess showing through covered by the final layer of paint. This naïve authentic approach can’t be done in Painter. And I need that look.

The discussion of what is better, digital or analogue work is absolutely rediculous if you ask me. A computer is a tool. It can provide you with options which aren’t available in any other medium. As a student you must (!!!) work in each and every medium you can get your hands on. Digital and analogue. You’re developing a style, a handwriting in which you will compose your images. You are going to tell a story and the style you have developed are the words that carry the message. I think that the way these ‘words’ are shaped (technique) are only important to the illustrator. It’s a creative voyage that lasts many years. Therefore I get angry when others say things like ‘digital is better because it is faster’ - or - ‘analoge is better because it looks like real art’. Rubbish! Styles are not chosen, they are the result of many years of study and fine-tuning. There is no ‘better’!

Is digital illustration ‘faster’? No it isn’t! If I would use Painter to paint my images I would not be done any quicker as with my paintbrushes and paint. Why? Well, because doing corrections with real paint is not done as easy as with digital media, I really need to make good decissions upfront. If I mess up I know I loose time. Time I do not have. By painting in traditional media I force myself to make good decisions in the beginning. Digital media are very forgiving. You can go back as far as you want. Adding colour is done with just one click. Briliant! Huge advantage for digital media. But… this can be a disadvantage too. If I would use digital media I would spend to much time experimenting with different colours and hue’s, just because I can with digital media. And I really doubt if my work would look better at the end because I did not really think things over.
Well, this is just me. I would not do good when working with digital media. Others do. For them a computer is a blessing. If you always worked with cut paper, a tool like Adobe Illustrator would be a blessing to you.

I could go on and on about this but i will stop now. Otherwise this post will be longer than the original posting.

4
Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

Comment by Jim Bryant

June 24, 2007 @ 7:02 am

As a traditional Illustrator with a half century of experience in publication and advertising, I find the sterility of digital illustration disturbing. With everyone using the same software, how does one identify the artist by viewing the work? The warmth and humanity are missing. A truly beautiful woman is one with a slight visual flaw that makes her unique: Cindy Crawford’s mole, or the gap in Lauren Hutton’s teeth.

I am repulsed by the absolute cold perfection of digital illustration. Besides, when the power fails I can light a candle and keep working.

5
Get your own gravatar for comments by visiting gravatar.com

Comment by heather

June 25, 2007 @ 4:18 pm

Hey Jim,
Thanks for your comment on my blog about your feelings on digital illustration! I reckon I would have totally agreed with you up until recently when I began seeing more and more digital illustration like Jeremy Enecio’s :

http://drawn.ca/2007/05/20/jeremy-enecio/

I could hardly believe how painterly this digital style is and how much life and light it has. I reckon that ‘cold’ digital style is the danger of going digital, but the best digital artists are able to apply their ability to see light to their digital illustrations and create something really warm & inviting.

I do agree though that the trap of digital illustrators is to make things too perfect or over-rendered, and art that is beautiful but imperfect holds a real human quality that is difficult to achieve with digital media.

Cheers,

Heather Castles

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment